Severe cutaneous adverse reactions.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), which include Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption, are life-threatening conditions. The pathogenesis of SCARs involves T cell receptors recognizing drug antigens presented by human leukocyte antigens, triggering the activation of distinct T cell subsets. These cells interact with keratinocytes and various immune cells, orchestrating cutaneous lesions and systemic manifestations. Genetic predisposition, impaired drug metabolism, viral reactivation or infections, and heterologous immunity influence SCAR development and clinical presentation. Specific genetic associations with distinct SCAR phenotypes have been identified, leading to the implementation of genetic screening before prescription in various countries to prevent SCARs. Whilst systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunomodulators have been the primary therapeutic agents, evolving strategies, including biologics and small molecules targeting tumour necrosis factor, different cytokines, or Janus kinase signalling pathways, signify a shift towards a precision management paradigm that considers individual clinical presentations.

Cutaneous Hypersensitivity Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed the management of various malignancies. Alongside their therapeutic success, the widespread application of ICIs has unveiled a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), most often affecting the skin. Cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs) encompass a range from common morbilliform and lichenoid rashes to more severe conditions such as bullous dermatoses and psoriasiform eruptions, each presenting distinct clinical challenges. Moreover, less common but clinically severe cutaneous reactions like toxic epidermal necrolysis have also been observed. cirAEs are frequently observed, with an incidence ranging from 37% to 70% for anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 antibodies and 17% to 40% for anti- programmed death-1/anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibodies. Recognizing the critical need for effective therapeutic strategies, this review carefully examines current approaches and guidelines for managing cirAEs.

Triggers, clinical manifestations and assessment of paediatric fixed drug eruptions: A systematic review of the literature.

Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a cutaneous drug reaction characterised by recurrent skin lesions occurring at the same site after each exposure to a causative agent. There is currently limited evidence in the paediatric population. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the clinical features, causative agents and management of paediatric FDE. A systematic search of the English and French literature on paediatric FDE was conducted using the Medline and Embase databases. After full-text article review, 92 articles were included, representing a total of 233 patients. Antibiotics were the most frequent triggering agents, mainly sulfonamides (65.0% of antibiotics). Systemic symptoms were rare, and most patients only received supportive therapy. One hundred and six patients (106) performed a test to confirm the causative agent. Of these, 72.6% had oral provocation tests (OPTs) and 28.3% had patch tests. The patient's age, presence of bullous lesions and mucosal lesions were similar between tested and untested patients. It did not seem to influence the decision to perform OPTs. Paediatric FDE is a non-severe skin drug reaction. Antibiotics were the most reported triggering agents. Drug testing, including oral provocation test, was safely performed in the paediatric population.

[Hydroxychloroquine-not always a harmless drug for off label use in dermatology]. / Hydroxychloroquin ­ nicht immer ein harmloses Medikament für den Off-label-Gebrauch in der Dermatologie.

Hydroxychloroquine is used for treatment of inflammatory diseases. It is considered to have few adverse effects. We report on a woman who developed a severe skin rash after intake of hydroxychloroquine, which she received for treatment of her lichen planopilaris. Based on the clinical, laboratory and histological findings the diagnosis of a drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)-like drug reaction was established. Our case illustrates that hydroxychloroquine can lead to severe adverse effects in rare cases and that patients receiving this drug must be thoroughly informed.

A Routine over the Counter Phenylephrine Causing Rarer Drug Eruption as Adverse Drug Reaction - A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Phenylephrine is a sympathomimetic, which means it acts analogous to adrenaline. Phenylephrine can be taken orally to treat nasal congestion symptoms. It is also frequently mixed with other medicines in products meant to relieve cough and cold symptoms. Given the widespread usage of phenylephrine, related drug eruptions appear to be uncommon. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we discuss a case of a 19-year-old female patient who reported to our hospital with blebs on the skin throughout her legs and torso. The drug eruption or adverse drug response was linked with itching, had a slow beginning, and progressed. Her medical history indicated that she had been taking phenylephrine 10 mg orally twice a day. On the sixth day, she experienced an adverse medication response caused by the medicine phenylephrine. Phenylephrine was stopped immediately and the other medications, such as levocetirizine, montelukast, and nasal spray, were continued. The patient was told not to use phenylephrine, either alone or in combination with FDCs. There are no other complaints. As a result, the patient was diagnosed with phenylephrine- induced eruption. CONCLUSION: We present this case to highlight the importance of inspiring a pharmacovigilance mindset among all clinicians providing care as a routine alert drug, phenylephrine-induced drug eruption.

Mucosal Fixed Drug Eruption with Oral, Conjunctival, Nasal, and Anal Lesions: A Case Report.

is missing (Short communication).

A Rare Skin Rash: Linezolid-Induced Purpuric Drug Eruption without Vasculitis in a Puerto Rican Man.

BACKGROUND Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are the skin's response to a systemic exposure to drugs. Linezolid is an oral oxazolidine used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Even though it has well-known adverse effects, purpuric cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely described. This report is of a Puerto Rican man in his 80s who developed an extensive purpuric drug eruption secondary to linezolid use. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon, since prompt identification and discontinuation of the agent are essential for recovery. CASE REPORT An 89-year-old Puerto Rican man was given oral linezolid therapy for healthcare-associated pneumonia and developed a widespread, purpuric cutaneous eruption 5 days into therapy. His condition prompted immediate discontinuation of the drug. Forty-eight hours after stopping the medication, he visited the Emergency Department. Abdominal punch biopsy revealed a superficial and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with dermal eosinophils, a pathologic finding consistent with a purpuric drug eruption. This allowed for a timely diagnosis, exclusion of other mimickers, such as cutaneous vasculitis, and effective management. CONCLUSIONS Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely reported in the literature. Due to the low incidence of this manifestation, the identification of the causative agent and accompanying treatment may be delayed. Mainstays in therapy are avoidance of the offending agent and treatment with corticosteroids, antihistamines, barrier ointments, and oral analgesics. Primary healthcare providers should be aware of linezolid-induced cutaneous manifestations, diagnostic clues, and treatment options so they can rapidly identify and effectively treat such complications.

An Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Acneiform Eruptions in Patients on Monoclonal Antibody Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors.

Acneiform eruptions occur frequently and early in patients on epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi). Identification of baseline patient risk factors would prompt earlier referral to dermatology to optimize prevention and management. The primary objective of this retrospective study is to determine the association between clinical and demographic characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with colon and head and neck cancers who started EGFRi between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were followed until death or September 2022. Baseline demographic and clinical parameters were documented and patients were followed from the time of diagnosis to most recent visit for the development and management of an acneiform eruption. Regression analyses were performed to determine the association between baseline characteristics and the development of acneiform eruptions. A total of 66 patients were treated with cetuximab or panitumumab between 2017-2021 were included in the analysis. Forty-seven of the sixty-six patients developed an acneiform eruption while on EGFRi therapy (71.2%). Combination cancer therapy with another chemotherapeutic agent was associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption (OR 0.03, P = .027). No other baseline features were statistically associated with a lower risk of acneiform eruption. Acneiform eruptions are a common cutaneous adverse event of EGFRi therapy. Ongoing research is required to elucidate risk factors for the development of acneiform eruptions, to improve the quality of life of oncology patients.

Lenalidomide-induced symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema.

Symmetric drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is a cutaneous drug reaction that presents with symmetrical erythema in the flexures. The reaction typically appears hours-to-days after drug exposure but has been reported to occur months after drug initiation. Diagnostic criteria include cutaneous reaction after exposure to a systemic drug, erythema of the gluteal region and/or V-shaped erythema of the inguinal areas, involvement of an additional intertriginous site, symmetry, and absence of systemic involvement. The rash typically presents as macular erythema. However, variations in morphology have been reported including papules, pustules, vesicles, and bullae. The histopathology of SDRIFE is non-specific and the diagnosis is made clinically. Cessation of the causative drug leads to gradual rash resolution. Beta-lactam antibiotics are the most implicated medications but case reports describe SDRIFE following monoclonal antibodies, chemotherapeutic agents, and various other medications. We present a patient with SDRIFE secondary to lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent. This case highlights the importance of considering SDRIFE in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with intertriginous erythema.